|
|
| Audios from Abualrub/Wood/White Debates! |
 Vote For One, Get the Second for Free!
By Jalal Abualrub
Come November, Americans will have the exciting choice for Commander in (Mis)Chief (as Br. Yusuf puts it) between John Hussein Obama and Barrak McCain (this is not a typo; vote for one and you will get the other for free). One of them is for al-Quds belonging to Jews forever, since he practically owns al-Quds; the other is like this: http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/325.html, and much more if you wish. This is very exciting, or better yet, exiting since whoever becomes president, whenever I and many more who look like me (i.e., Muslim) try to exit the country, our Kufis will still be searched by the (un)intelligence services for smuggled cows hidden underneath the Kufis. The other option for Americans, Ralph Nader, is surely more intelligent than these two, but he should change that awful looking cheap suit which he seems to have been wearing for the past twenty years. He stole my idea it seems. Since many American men are frequently described as ‘Couch Potatoes’, and to suit the lazy nature of such potatoes, I thought of a brilliant idea: Disposable Pants. Men can now wear my innovative disposable pants for months at a time until they become green, or until they look like Nader’s suit, then they can dispose of them and wear more pants for a few more months at a time. They no longer have to change pants on a weekly basis as they do now. And why change pants? Americans have been voting for the same president since 1980. May be this is why the presidents since 1980 and the two new hopefuls look awful lot like Nader’s cheap suit. We live in exciting times, don’t we? So for those who ask me as to whom they should vote, I say, vote for the cow I keep hiding under my Kufi every time I travel. At least you will get milk and a Dhabeeha hamburger.
Jalal Abualrub |
|
| The Blessed Month is Coming Soon! |
The Blessed Month is Coming Soon
Alhamdulillah, Madinah Educational Center & Al-Mustaqbal Home-School, Windsor Locks, Connecticut, will Inshaallah soon be ready for Ramadhan and the blessings Allah brings with Ramadhan. The MEC Musalla is almost ready; We have a Hafidh teaching Quran memorization Monday-Thursday from 12-2 PM; Inshaallah, we will soon hire the Hafidh as our full-time Imam. We Urgently Need Copies of the Quran & Islamic Books in Arabic and English
Mail us whatever Allah permits you of copies of the Quran, English and Arabic Islamic books, Islamic CDs & DVDs, etc. Our mailing address is: MEC, P. O. Box 336, Windsor Locks, CT. 06096.
We Also Need Financial Support for Our Quran School & to Hire a Full-Time Imam Allah, Sub`hanahu wa-ta`ala, said, {The Masajid of Allâh shall be maintained only by those who believe in Allâh and the Last Day; perform As-Salât (Iqâmat-as-Salât), and give Zakât and fear none but Allâh. It is they who are on true guidance} [9:18]; Rasulullah, salla-llahu alaihi wa-sallam, said, “The best among you are those who learn and teach the Quran.” [Bukhari] Donate in Allah’s Sake for our Quran-School; help us hire our Quran teacher as a full-time Imam before Ramadhan starts Inshaallah. Mail your donation to us, or donate online Inshaallah: Log onto www.islamlife.com; click on PayPal Donate button (top right).
Inshaallah, any amount will help, {And whatever you spend in good, it will be repaid to you in full, and you shall not be wronged} [2:272].
As-salamu alaikum warahmatullah Jalal Abualrub (www.islamlife.com)
MEC, P. O. Box 336, Windsor Locks, CT 06096 |
|
| Video: How to Love the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) |
Video: How to Love the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him)
With Jalal Abualrub
Hosted by: The Deen Show |
|
Video: What is Jihad?
With Jalal Abualrub
Hosted by: The Deen Show
|
|
An Open Letter to 'Social Cohesion'
by Jalal Abualrub
My name is Jalal Abualrub. I recently read parts of a PDF file published by your organization titled ‘Hate on the State’ (www.socialcohesion.co.uk/pdf/HateOnTheState.pdf ). As much as I fail to understand the rationale of the authors, James Brandon and Douglas Murray, who simply took the age-old Western and Christian fanatical approach towards Islam and reasserted these in their paper, I also fail to understand how an organization like yours fails to check the facts these authors wrote before publishing their paper. For starters, my book, Biography and Mission of Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab, was not published in Saudi Arabia, and I should add, or by Saudi Arabia. This book was published in the United States of America under ISBN number 0-9703766-5-0. By simply referring to the outside and inside covers, you will find that this book was actually published in the glorious West. Saudi Arabic has absolutely nothing to do with this book either with regards to research, publishing or funding. My book is not even on sale in Saudi Arabia; I just sent a few copies of it as gifts to various Saudi organizations and respected scholars. I borrowed US$ 20,000 to pay for printing this book and I am still struggling to pay this debt, even years after publishing it; Saudi could have paid this amount and far, far more than this amount, don’t you think? As for the mentioned authors’ stance on the so-called Wahhabi movement, why don’t these two authors challenge the facts in my book, which is in 700 pages, i.e., seven hundred, instead of brushing it aside in their most unscientific method? I am ready and willing to challenge these two authors on their paper and on the topic of it, especially on whom it fits more they or I. Instead of inciting hatred against Muslims who dare challenge the simplistic views of Western authors, thinkers, historians, college professors, and lately, even journalists, who are not known for their vast knowledge, to say the least, why don’t you actually have a real debate on Islam and other Islamic topics, including Wahhabism. Why does it aggravate you that British libraries have copies of books you do not agree with? Is not Britain the second birthplace of the glorious Western ideals of freedom of thought and freedom of religion? If all what you have in your libraries are books that agree with your faulty views about Islam, how then can you insist on the West being free societies and also keep on fighting this imaginary enemy, Islam, if you only hear what you have to say about it? This would also be most boring, wouldn’t it? And you are not even Muslims! Can you hear what Muslims have to say about Islam for a change? And yes, you do not need to also incite America against Jalal Abualrub, I already sent a copy of this book along with a few copies of my book on Jihad, Holy Wars…Crusades…Jihad, to the FBI. I would be happy to send copies of these books to Britain’s MI5 and BBC too, and also to the PM and all of the MP’s if someone provides me with an address of theirs that will assure that these people will actually receive the book and take the time to read anything of benefit. You seem to show courage in helping the continuing defamation of Islam. Can you show the same courage to accept my humble challenge to debate your authors on their paper? We can do it in Britain if you wish. I already get searched thoroughly every time I travel, so another search will not really aggravate me more than what I already feel. Every time they search under my Islamic hat (koofi) as if I am going to hide a cow underneath it. Sad, isn’t it? Western people just can’t seem to understand the power of Islam and seem to make things worse for themselves and for their future generations by picking up a fight against the most powerful religion there is, the faith of one out of every five human beings. Is there an end to this? I agree that your paper should be titled ‘Hate on the State’. You should know. You are trying to incite state-sponsored hatred and censorship against Muslims who dare respond to frequent defamation of their religion. I will await your response, or at least, a response from your two authors to debate their book with me in public. Please, do not say that you do not necessarily support what these two wrote, because you do and you published it. Jalal Abualrub www.islamlife.Com |
|
| Madinah Educational Center is Now Open!! |
| Validity of the Bible (4) |
Validity of the Bible as an Authentic Source (4)
Acts
By Various Contributors to (www.islamlife.com)
Authorship: Acts (like the gospel of Luke) is an anonymous document since it does not identify an author for itself. It is, however, quite possible that the Christian traditions are correct in attributing it to a follower of Paul, Luke, who was, nonetheless, not an eyewitness to the ministry of Jesus (P).
According to Raymond Brown: In summary, it is not impossible that a minor figure who had traveled with Paul for small parts of his ministry wrote Acts decades after the apostle was dead, if one makes the allowance that there were details about Paul's early life he did not know, that he simplified and reordered information ...
Read More ............................................. |
|
Sam Shamoun is Complaining!
I hear that poor Sam Shamoun is complaining of how hard I am hitting him in my responses and that I call him names. This is a man (which is a figure of speech in his case) who uses the most foul words of abuse he can find in his Christian Dictionary of Abusive Words against our beloved Prophet, Muhammad, his master and chief, and yet he is complaining of my attacks on him? Of course I will continue responding strongly to his foul mouth and filthy descriptions of Muhammad, unless and until he behaves himself and acts like a human being, which is a long shot in his case. The Sham cannot abuse Muhammad and fabricate lies against him and then expect Muslims not to respond, because we will respond regardless of who likes it or who hates it. What's to come for the Sham is worse, because I will try and respond occasionally to his filthy lies about Islam as much as I can. Truth is always victorious, and Islam is the Truth.
Jalal Abualrub |
|
| Validity of the Bible (3) |
Validity of the Bible as an Authentic Source (3)
Pastoral Epistles: Titus; 1 Timothy; 2 Timothy
By Various Contributors to (www.islamlife.com)
These three letters have been authored (most probably) by the same author. According to the late Catholic scholar, Father Raymond Brown, "80 to 90 percent of critical scholarship" regards them to be "pseudonymous" and places them "toward the end of the 1st century (Raymond E. Brown, An Introduction To The New Testament, 1997, Doubleday, p. 639). Briefly, “pseudonymous” are those writings which claim to have been authored by a particular person but which probably were not authored by the named individual................. Read More |
|
| Validity of the Bible (2) |
Validity of the Bible as an Authentic Source (2)
By Various Contributors to (www.islamlife.com)
John Barton [Oriel and Laing Professor of the Interpretation of Holy Scripture, University of Oxford, and Fellow of Oriel College, Oxford ] states: The author of John's gospel is, as we have noted already, unlikely to have been an immediate disciple of Jesus, if only because so much of the material in the synoptic gospels is missing from John. The likelihood is therefore that all the historical books of the New Testament are not eyewitness accounts of the events described...................................... Read More
|
|
| Latest Active Forum Threads |
|
Not a member yet? Click here to register.
Forgotten your password? Request a new one here.
|
|
